Norwegen Afterski Team – NAT – Follow/Fav Ethics of Animal Testing An essay applying utilitarianism to animal testing. I have done this for any class in college and got a great score. This is not my own opinion, this is an assignment i aced.

Follow/Fav Ethics of Animal Testing An essay applying utilitarianism to animal testing. I have done this for any class in college and got a great score. This is not my own opinion, this is an assignment i aced.

Rated: Fiction K – English – Words: 964 – Reviews: 16 – Favs: 2 – Published: 3/27/2004 – Status: Complete – id: 1563663 – Full 3/4 1/2 Expand Tighten The Ethics of Animal Testing

blog

Long ago, while laws were not set up to prevent it, some researchers experimented on animals. The actual outcome of such experiments are still sometimes along with us today. Take insulin, one example is, it was actually discovered when an Ontario doctor severed the bond regarding the pancreas and also the gastrointestinal system of an dog.1 Today you will find many animals in labs being tested to locate cures for anything from cancer to pain killers. When the results have a very possibility of saving so many lives, as in the case of insulin for any with diabetes, then testing on animals ought to be the right action to take right? Many individuals disagree saying that the suffering associated with an animal is just not definitely worth the saving of lives, specifically if the tests are unsuccessful. They compare the animal’s lives for those of humans, claiming that it is not right to test on human orphans. Therefore it ought not to be ability to test on stray animals. So therein lies the ethical dilemma; is it ability to experiment on animals?

Within this paper I will examine animal rights using a utilitarians viewpoint. I will define the major points that utilitarianism holds and animal testing. I will explore the cases for and against animal testing using utilitarian reasoning (including Bentham and Mill’s disagreement, act and rule utilitarianism, and cost-benefit analysis). Finally I will close with my personal feelings on animal experimentation and my conclusions drawn from your analysis.

First, utilitarian theory is consequentionalist and stress the ends of any particular action. Also, it is Hedonistic in nature, which means that is focuses primarily on happiness and pleasure, those being the one intrinsic good. A utilitarian considers five factors while in the pleasure with the consequences connected with an act, whichever act brings about the foremost pleasure or happiness is the ideal course of action naturally. John Mill argued that the standard of the pleasure is a vital consideration also. Consider even the difference between act utilitarianism (considering each act individually) and rule utilitarianism (using the consequences of some act universally). Also, a contemporary version of utilitarianism, cost-benefit analysis, states that whatever act produces the most money (or saves the most money), is decision that ought to be made.

Second, animal testing comprises of any medical test performed when using animal. Including product testing, like perfume and cleaners, and research for instance the negative effects of isolation over a social animal. To check animal testing using a utilitarian standpoint we should consider whether or not an animal can seem to be pain, or suffer. We typically do not consider animals to always be without feeling, that is why we now have laws protecting animals against cruelty. A lot of people disagree about regardless of whether locking an animal at a cage is cruelty or otherwise.

True for animal testing Using utilitarianism generally, if testing on animals produces the foremost happiness overall and reduces suffering then it is the most suitable move to make. When medical breakthrough are intended at the expense of an animal, is the happiness of those that could very well be cured more than the suffering in the animal who underwent the experiments? Mill would seem to argue that the happiness of somebody who has been cured is going to be more durable and better then an self gratifying happiness connected with an animal. Act utilitarianism would examine each instance of animal testing and find out should the consequences are better when the animal is tested on than whether it were not. Finally, cost-benefit analysis would find a way to go along with animal testing because innovations in medicine means money made and saved on medical care. This certainly will produce the most money and is the better thing to do if the question is to evaluate or maybe not.

The actual situation against animal testing Jeremy Bentham was purely worried about the degree of pleasure produced. You could consider that how much suffering an animal may be exposed to in tests are not worth how much suffering that might be reduced if your cure were found. Those who are against animal testing would not experience pleasure and can imagine that those testing the animals would not gain happiness from watching your pet suffer. Therefore one could argue that not testing on the animals would indeed reduce suffering and maximize pleasure. Rule utilitarianism applies best here, because then anyone can find the consequences of everyone testing on animals at all. Using that much freedom to testing negative consequences may be able to occur and consequently banning animal testing are the best action.

Follow/Fav Ethics of Animal Testing An essay applying utilitarianism to animal testing. I have done this for any class in college and got a great score. This is not my own opinion, this is an assignment i aced.

Follow/Fav Ethics of Animal Testing An essay applying utilitarianism to animal testing. I have done this for any class in college and got a great score. This is not my own opinion, this is an assignment i aced.

Related Posts